tomtheelder2020
Well-Known Member
Updating and requesting input on a previously posted topic.
History: My 1951 house had a 6 circuit, 100 amp fuse box in the laundry room when I purchased it in 1990. In order to install AC when we moved in, I had a 200 amp circuit breaker box installed in the garage (separated from house by breezeway) and the fuse box was made a sub-panel. I recently had galvanized pipe water system replaced with PEX. That means a heavy gauge system ground wire connecting the fuse box to the galvanized pipe now connects to nothing. In fact, a water pipe repair 20+ years ago included a dielectric coupling so that wire had done nothing for a long time. Intending to install GFCI receptacles, I discovered that one in the laundry room was not controlled by any fuse. An electrician confirmed that circuit had been wired to bypass the fuses. The fuse box is behind a water heater in the laundry room, which does not meet code, but it is higher so accessible.
Current: I have received three bids to replace the fuses with breakers:
1) Remove the fuse box and replace it with a breaker box at that location. $1000
2) Remove the fuse box and replace it with a breaker box at that location. Run a new 3-wire cable from main panel to sub-panel so that it (but not circuits) will be grounded. $1,850
3) Remove fuse box and replace it with a junction box. Run new wires for each circuit to the main panel and install circuit breakers for each. $1,450
I also had a bid the same as #2 but they want $4,300 for the job so ... I don't think I will use them.
Aside from cost, what do you see as the advantages or disadvantages of each approach? With #1 Should I drive a ground rod outside the foundation and connect it to that system ground wire in the subfloor or has that been unnecessary since it was made a sub-panel 30 years ago? Getting the sub-panel out from behind the water heater would be nice, but does it really make a difference? Running a new cable with ground to the sub-panel (#2) also seems a good idea - but is it any better than running new wires for each circuit to the main panel? With #2, could I run ground wires through the subfloor from individual receptacles to the sub-panel so they would have an equipment ground? What other advantages/disadvantages/issues are there? Thanks.
History: My 1951 house had a 6 circuit, 100 amp fuse box in the laundry room when I purchased it in 1990. In order to install AC when we moved in, I had a 200 amp circuit breaker box installed in the garage (separated from house by breezeway) and the fuse box was made a sub-panel. I recently had galvanized pipe water system replaced with PEX. That means a heavy gauge system ground wire connecting the fuse box to the galvanized pipe now connects to nothing. In fact, a water pipe repair 20+ years ago included a dielectric coupling so that wire had done nothing for a long time. Intending to install GFCI receptacles, I discovered that one in the laundry room was not controlled by any fuse. An electrician confirmed that circuit had been wired to bypass the fuses. The fuse box is behind a water heater in the laundry room, which does not meet code, but it is higher so accessible.
Current: I have received three bids to replace the fuses with breakers:
1) Remove the fuse box and replace it with a breaker box at that location. $1000
2) Remove the fuse box and replace it with a breaker box at that location. Run a new 3-wire cable from main panel to sub-panel so that it (but not circuits) will be grounded. $1,850
3) Remove fuse box and replace it with a junction box. Run new wires for each circuit to the main panel and install circuit breakers for each. $1,450
I also had a bid the same as #2 but they want $4,300 for the job so ... I don't think I will use them.
Aside from cost, what do you see as the advantages or disadvantages of each approach? With #1 Should I drive a ground rod outside the foundation and connect it to that system ground wire in the subfloor or has that been unnecessary since it was made a sub-panel 30 years ago? Getting the sub-panel out from behind the water heater would be nice, but does it really make a difference? Running a new cable with ground to the sub-panel (#2) also seems a good idea - but is it any better than running new wires for each circuit to the main panel? With #2, could I run ground wires through the subfloor from individual receptacles to the sub-panel so they would have an equipment ground? What other advantages/disadvantages/issues are there? Thanks.